The Boston Globe's Farah Stockman on Afghanistan Elections
The measure would have repealed a 2011 law allowing resort casinos to operate within the state.
Based on the wording of the measure, a yes vote on Question 3 meant no casinos in the state, and a no vote would have upheld the law facilitating the licensing of up to three resort-style casinos.
On June 18, 2014, the group Repeal the Casino Deal submitted approximately 26,000 signatures to local registrars for certification.
The measure point groton casino address long certified for the sydney fc international games ballot on.
Election results Below are the official, certified election results: Massachusetts Question 3 Result Votes Percentage d No 1,271,404 60.
This would make those types of gaming subject to existing state laws providing criminal penalties for, or otherwise regulating or prohibiting, activities involving illegal boston globe casino poll polls />The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.
A YES VOTE would prohibit casinos, any gaming establishment with slot machines, and wagering on simulcast greyhound races.
A NO VOTE would make no change in the current laws regarding gaming.
The several provisions of this Act are independent and severable and the invalidity, if any, of any part or feature thereof shall not affect or render the remainder of sydney fc international games Act invalid or inoperative.
Support The measure was sponsored by the group Repeal The Casino Deal.
Jobs are coming back.
Just ask Atlantic City, Las Vegas and Detroit.
Repeal the Casino Deal published a report detailing myths versus facts.
FACTS: Massachusetts has recovered from the recession more info better than states with casinos - just look at the numbers.
Our unemployment rate was just 5.
Our resilient Commonwealth has already added https://fabernet.ru/casino/clearwater-casino-brunch.html jobs since the 2011 casino law passed and will continue to add 45,000 to 50,000 jobs each year through 2017 in vibrant industries such as finance, tech, health care and higher education.
MYTH: Casinos would offer good, stable jobs for Massachusetts families.
About half of the jobs that Mohegan Sun could offer to Revere families pay below that living wage.
That number includes laid-off casino workers coming from Atlantic City and Connecticut who will be more attractive hires because they require career center casino training.
read article A successful repeal would mean slashing construction jobs.
FACTS: Construction cranes pepper skylines across the Commonwealth.
State job experts predict we will see a net increase of about 15,042 construction jobs by the close of 2015.
MYTH: Casinos are strong economic engines that will carry our communities.
Smaller venues like Reno and Atlantic City are desperately trying to rebrand sydney fc international games to cast themselves as hubs for industries where Massachusetts is already a leader, such as high tech.
Businesses do not come here.
Listen to the experts.
Vote Yes: Stop the casino mess.
The Law already has provided voters in several communities, including Springfield and Plainville, an opportunity to bring much needed jobs and economic activity to their communities through first-class development projects.
At the same time, the Law has ensured that no community opposed to a casino within its borders will have one.
To help further protect casino velkomstbonus maria, the Law contains industry leading consumer safeguards and dedicated public health funding.
Vote no on question 3 to create jobs, economic growth and much-needed new revenue in Massachusetts.
Still, once voters work that out, the question becomes pretty clear.
Supporters of casinos are correct: They create jobs, and three sydney fc international games operators approved boston globe casino poll polls far — Penn National in Plainville, Wynn Resorts in Everett, and MGM in Springfield — are among the strongest in the casino industry.
But the last three years have shown that critics were right, too.
Massachusetts took many risks, in terms of both quality of life and political integrity, to roll out the welcome mat for casinos.
Voters should repeal the casino legislation by voting yes on Question 3.
Massachusetts recovered from the most recent economic recession faster than other states — without a casino — and continues to see economic growth.
And yes, casinos bring tourism, but this is Boston globe casino poll polls, not Las Vegas.
The Commonwealth, with its volatile weather and inconvenient locations, will never be the premier gambling destination of the East Coast.
Do you know what else casinos bring?
Crime, addiction and a whole range of seediness, something Massachusetts does not need.
Just when all of that is within reach — and yes, in the case of Plainville, shovels already in the ground — is no time to turn back the clock.
This is money that should be staying home, in the Bay State, and providing income for our own workers and their families.
Vote NO on Question 3 and preserve Massachusetts' casino gaming law and the new jobs, income, and tax revenue it will bring to our borders.
The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race.
Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff.
If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to Path to the ballot See also: Supporters first had to submit the initiative, signed by ten voters, to the by.
The attorney general then had to determine whether the measure met the legal requirements for circulation.
Supporters continued on with the ballot process, in spite of the pending judicial case.
In order to qualify for the ballot, supporters were required to collect a minimum of byand submit them to local registrars for certification.
Then, these certified petitions were successfully filed with the on the deadline ofafter which the secretary of state determined enough valid signatures had been collected.
Repeal The Casino Deal submitted an estimated 73,000 signatures to the secretary of state.
As of May 6, 2014, the Supreme Court had yet to rule on the case, so the boston globe casino poll polls process continued.
The had untilto either accept or reject the measure or take no action.
No action was taken; therefore, the original supporters of the measure must collect an additional and submit them to local registrars for certification by.
These signatures then had to be filed with no later than.
On June 18, 2014, Repeal the Casino Deal submitted approximately 26,000 signatures to local registrars.
On June 24, 2014, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled the ballot question legal.
The measure was certified for the 2014 ballot on.
Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
Globe Today - Voters heading to the polls today
The poll is the first public survey of the general election in Massachusetts. Read the full Mass. general election poll By Globe Staff , September 19, 2018, 9:00 a.m.
Here and so too happens:)
The matchless answer ;)
Certainly. And I have faced it. We can communicate on this theme. Here or in PM.
Bravo, what excellent message